Connect with us

Politics

Will Bobi Wine’s NUP crumble like a pack of cards Mbabazi style?

Published

on


Bobi Wine

 

The emergence of Kyadondo East MP Ssentamu Kyagulanyi as a so-called main challenger against President Museveni has scaring parallels to that of former ‘Super Minister’ John Patrick Amama Mbabazi in 2015.

When Mbabazi emerged to challenge President Museveni in 2015, his supporters argued that Dr Kizza Besigye, a man who has led the most serious challenge for the presidency, gives way and leaves the stage to the new entrant on the block.

Under intense pressure from Mbabazi acolytes and the ever gullible and deceptive donors, Besigye dithered with the idea of backing the former Prime Minister and only definitively abandoned it after a foresighted section of his party insisted that there was no chance of him making way for another candidate.

Mbabazi insisted on contesting and the results bore out those who backed Besigye to stand after the Go-Forward candidate polled a measly 136,519 votes. To put Mbabazi’s abysmal performance in context, it is important to note that there were 477,319 invalid votes.

Suffice to note that Erias Lukwago, a key Besigye ally, polled 176,637 votes to win the mayoral race, 40,118 votes more than Mbabazi managed to marshal countrywide.

Fast forward to 2020 and we are back to the situation we had in 2015.

Bobi Wine, a singer-turned-politician after winning a by- election in Kyadondo East parliamentary race, now wants to challenge President Museveni for the presidency, which is well within his rights.

However, Bobi Wine, like Mbabazi in 2015, has solely focused his artillery on Dr Besigye, insisting the veteran opposition politician should give way to another candidate to challenge Mr Museveni.

Like a football player focusing on a teammate who does not possess the ball while the opponent freely dribbles, Bobi Wine and his excitable acolytes have turned their arsenal on Besigye, accusing him of monopolising the struggle to remove Museveni.

And Bobi Wine has surrounded himself with the same opposition MPs that coalesced around Mbabazi in 2015, parroting the claims they did in 2015.

Masaka Municipality MP Mathias Mpuuga and Busiro East MP Medard Sseggona were the lynchpins behind Mbabazi’s botched bid in 2015. The duo are now the master planners of Bobi Wine’s candidature and have been leading a covert campaign against Dr Besigye.

In announcing that he will not be running in the 2021 elections, Dr Besigye has literally given this group the proverbial rope to hang itself.

They have been arguing that he is not giving them space, now they have the space but they are still grumbling. With them, Dr Besigye is damned if he does and damned if he does not.

The spiky nature of NUP’s supporters reared its ugly ahead on Sunday during the burial of Former Kampala Mayor Nasser Ntege Ssebagala in the Kisaasi suburb of Kampala.

At the burial, Dr Besigye was notably absent and he later tweeted that he is in self-isolation as he may have potentially been exposed to #Covid-19.

Bobi Wine’s supporters were, however, running bonkers on social media, accusing Dr Besigye of deliberately skipping Ssebaggala’s burial for political reasons.

Ssebaggala famously supported Dr Besigye’s 2001 presidential bid, after his own attempt at contesting was upended on grounds that he lacked the minimum academic qualifications.

So when Dr Besigye was absent from Ssebaggala’s burial, Bobi Wine’s supporters went apoplectic.

Bobi Wine and his supporters now have the stage to themselves and should be wary of not crumbling Mbabazi style.

 


Post Views:
15



Source – eagle.co.ug

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Mbale: Wanyoto Files 123 Affidavits Petitioning Court to Nullify Galiwango’s Victory

Published

on

By


Lydia Wanyoto Mutende, former National Chairperson of the National Resistance Movement (NRM) Women’s League, has petitioned the High Court in Mbale demanding for the nullification of the victory of Connie Nakayenze Galiwango who won the Mbale City Woman MP race in the January 14 polls.

Wanyoto, who held the NRM ticket, was floored by her hereditary competitor and incumbent Woman MP of Mbale District, Galiwango, who defeated her with a range of over 20,000 votes.

Galiwango was declared the winner, after scoring 40,702 votes (53.2%) followed by Wanyoto who got 25,276 votes (33%).

Other candidates in the race were; Robinah Masibo from the National Unity Platform party (NUP) who got 6565 votes, Maimuna Nambuya with 1852 votes, Shadia Luwungule, who had lost in the NRM primaries got 1382 votes while Racheal K Nansubuga trailed with 643 votes.

Galiwango, who had lost the NRM ticket to Wanyoto, decided to come back as an Independent candidate in the final race, citing discrepancies in the primaries.

Days after declaration of the winner, Wanyoto told reporters in a press conference at her home that her victory had been robbed by Galiwango whom she accused of ordering the brutalization of her (Wanyoto’s) polling agents.

“My polling agents from Bugema, Nakaloke, Bukasakya and Bungokho-Mutoto sub counties were beaten by the supporters of Nakayenze and destroyed my DR forms. I can’t accept the results and we are going to Courts of Law to challenge this because I believe that I won the race but the Electoral Commission declared a wrong person,” she said.

Wanyoto interacting with the electorate during the campaigns in January 2021.

In her election petition filed to Mbale High Court yesterday March 2, Wanyoto filed 123 affidavits, which she said contained all the evidence that is enough to nullify the victory and order for vote recount.

Her lawyers lead by Eddy Mauso Ngule of N Mugoda Advocates told reporters shortly after filing the petition that they are sure of winning the case basing on the evidence they have presented.

“The entire voting process was hijacked by the second respondent, beating, intimidating, ferrying materials, tampering with materials, our evidence (videos and photographs) shows how boxes were opened,” Ngule said.

He added that within ten days, the Court is likely to set the first hearing date of the Case if Galiwango’s side responds to their affidavits.

“Within ten days, they will have filed their replies and if they don’t, the Court will determine the matter but if they have their replies, then the Court shall set the date for first hearing,” he noted.

Wanyoto has paraded three law firms; N Mugoda Advocates, Springs Advocates and Mugabi Shaka Advocates, in this particular case.

“As NRM party, we are going to use all means of regaining our victory,” she said.

 



Source – chimpreports.com

Continue Reading

Politics

Bobi Wine Petition Takeover: Court Advises Mayambala to Hire Lawyers, File Formal Application

Published

on

By


Former presidential candidate Willy Mayambala has been advised to seek the services of a lawyer to enable him file a formal application to take over a presidential election petition that has been abandoned by Robert Kyagulanyi Ssentamu.

The advice from the Supreme Court follows a letter written by Mayambala on Thursday seeking to be guided on how he can take over the petition which Kyagulanyi was withdrawing from the court.

The National Unity Platform (NUP) lost interest in the petition after failing to submit several affidavits which they had collected from various parts of the country as proof that the election cycle was characterized by violence, bribery, alteration of results, and intimidation among others.

Kyagulanyi also cited the abduction and torture of witnesses, interference with his privacy by security operatives whom he said were working on the command of President Yoweri Museveni and the Attorney General who are the first and third respondents to the petition.

However, the registrar of the Supreme Court Harriet Nalukwago Ssali said that Mayambala needs to follow procedures laid out in the Presidential Elections Act to inherit the petition.

Section 61(2) of the Presidential Election Act provides that on hearing of the application for withdrawing, any candidate who might have been a petitioner in respect of the election to which the petitioner refers may apply to the court to be substituted as a petitioner for the petitioner who desires to withdraw.”

The registrar advised Mayambala to seek the services of a lawyer with a view of filing a formal application. But Mayambala told URN that he had not yet seen the letter, and could not comment further on the matter or even engage any legal teams beforehand.

Mayambala who polled the least votes in a race that attracted 11 candidates had previously said that he was happy with the outcome of the January 14, 2021, general elections that saw the incumbent President Yoweri Museveni announced the winner with 68 percent. He said that he had no intentions of challenging the Electoral Commission results issued by Justice Simon Byabakama.

When Kyagulanyi filed his application for withdrawing on Wednesday, a panel of nine Supreme Court Justices led by Chief Justice Alfonse Owiny-Dollo advised him to submit an affidavit from one of his lawyers supporting the withdrawal. The Registrar of the Supreme Court will now publish a copy of the application in the Uganda Gazette, in line with the laws governing the withdrawal of presidential election petitions.

——————-

By: URN

Comments

comments





Source – thetowerpost.com

Continue Reading

Politics

21 Newly Elected MPs Under Police Investigation Over Altered DR Forms

Published

on

By


The Criminal Investigations Department is investigating 21 newly elected Members of Parliament for allegedly altering declaration forms and forging academic papers.

A senior detective at CID headquarters Kibuli says that the electoral and political offences department headed by Henry Mugumya is investigating MPs from 11 districts.

The source has named some of the districts whose elected MPs risk being arraigned before courts of law. Some of these districts include, Kween, Wakiso, Namayingo, Namisindwa, Kikuube and four others from the West Nile sub-region.

“Investigations have started with 21 MPs while six others are pending. The MPs are major members of the National Resistance Movement-NRM which is being accused by the electorate and rivals of forging academic papers and bribing presiding officers who altered results on DR forms. There is already evidence to support these allegations,” CID source said.

When contacted, Mugumya declined to give details saying information regarding all the electoral and political offences of the recently concluded general elections will at an appropriate time be shared through the police spokespersons.

A CID source further revealed that all investigations commanders in districts where elected MPs are being probed have been warned to dare not succumb to bribes. It is alleged that some of the MPs have learnt about the on-going investigations and are attempting to frustrate the process.

“Our team has submitted some DR forms to our Directorate of Forensic Science and some politicians were declared winners with altered results. Our team will get reports from document analysts and prosecutors will use them as evidence,” the source said.

The Electoral Commission spokesperson Paul Bukenya said they have no business with investigations being done by a recognized agency like CID. Bukenya adds that DR forms are public documents that can be used by any person at any time.

Sources said at least 200 DR forms for the various electoral process are being examined by Directorate of Forensic Science-DFS based at Naguru police headquarters. DFS is headed by Superintendent of Police –SP Andrew Mubiru.

————————

By: URN

Comments

comments





Source – thetowerpost.com

Continue Reading

Trending